Skip to Main Content
Building Safety Journal Logo

Building Safety Journal - International Code Council

Main Menu

Menu

      • April, 2025 Articles
      • March, 2025 Articles
      • February, 2025 Articles
      • January, 2025 Articles
      • December, 2024 Articles
      • November, 2024 Articles
      • 2025 Articles
      • 2024 Articles
      • Deep Dives
      • Member News
      • Personal Perspectives
      • Quick Hits
      • Technical Topics
      • Press Releases
      • Sponsored Content
      • View All
      • Buildings, Construction, Architecture/Design
      • Fire, Wildland-Urban Interface
      • Plumbing, Mechanical, Fuel Gas, Pools/Spas
      • Energy, Solar, Green, Sustainability
      • Disaster Preparedness, Mitigation, Resiliency
  • Subscribe
    • ICC Family of Solutions
    • ICCSafe
    • myICC
    • Digital Codes
    • cdpACCESS
    • Store
    • Support

Join today!

Keep up-to-date on crucial industry news, innovative training and expert technical advice with a free subscription to the award-winning Building Safety Journal.

Subscribe

Sign In or Register Here

Provide your email address
Provide your password
Answer the math challenge
Please enter your e-mail address below. We will email you a link to reset your password.
Provide your email address
Answer the math challenge
To complete your registration, please verify your email address.
Answer the math challenge

We have emailed the address you provided. Please click the link in the email to confirm your email address.

Your account has been marked for password reset. Please change your password.
Provide your new password
Verify your new password
Answer the math challenge 2 plus eight

Only registered ICC members have access to this article at this time.

Explore all the benefits that ICC Membership has to offer and become a member today to gain access to this exciting content.

If you're already an ICC member Sign In Now.

Can We Help?

  • Reset My Password
  • I Need More Help

Lead Structural Engineer Shares Insights on the Burj Khalifa, the World’s Tallest Structure

Larry Novak, Chief Structural Engineer for the Code Council, shares why this record-breaking structure is a significant achievement in terms of utilizing the latest design, codes, materials and construction technology and methods to provide an efficient, rational structure.

August 8th, 2023
by Lawrence Novak
  • Technical Topics

The goal of the Burj Khalifa Tower is not simply to be the world’s highest building; it is to embody the world’s highest aspirations.

During the six years and 22 million man-hours of construction to complete, the final height of the building was a “well-guarded secret”. At the opening ceremony on Jan. 4, 2010, the final height was revealed to be 828 meters (2,717 feet). This height “comfortably” exceeded the previous record holder, the 509-meter (1,671 feet) tall Taipei 101.

We are going to need a new word other than “skyscraper”. The Burj Khalifa doesn’t scrape the sky – it pierces it like a slender shiny needle, over half a mile high. The view from the top is more like looking out of a plane than a building.

Taking into consideration the curvature of the earth, one can see over 60 miles in all directions from the top of the spire on a clear day.

The 280,000-square-meter (3,000,000-square-foot) multi-use Burj Khalifa Tower is utilized for retail, a Giorgio Armani Hotel, residential and office space. The building has 700 residential apartments located from floors 45 to 108 and the remaining spaces till the 160th floor are occupied by the corporate officers.

The facts and figures about the tower are likewise surreal – like how it is 15 degrees Fahrenheit cooler at the top than at the bottom, or that you could watch the sunset at the ground level, then take the elevator up to the observation deck and watch the same sunset all over again.  It is a new order of tallness.

The Burj Khalifa
The Burj Khalifa

Building Code and Structural Standards Applied to the Burj Khalifa

As with all super-tall projects, the construction of the Burj Khalifa met difficult structural engineering problems that needed to be addressed and resolved.

With safety in mind, building codes guard against unforeseen perils, including fires, earthquakes, electrical currents and more.

The current Dubai Building Code (DBC) was published in 2021 with the objective of unifying building design across Dubai.

Prior to the DBC being issued, the Dubai Municipality (DM) had specific regulations. Additionally, design teams and contractors relied on various documents to ensure their building projects meet the required standards. Generally, projects such as the Burj Khalifa, were designed and constructed in accordance with the requirements of the UAE Fire and Life Safety Code as well British Standards (BS) and American Codes and Standards.

Figure 1 - Burj Khalifa in Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Figure 1 – Burj Khalifa in Dubai, United Arab Emirates

For the design of the Burj Khalifa the following structural standards were applied:

  • Reinforced Concrete Design Standard: The American Concrete Institute’s (ACI) ACI 318-02 Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete was accepted by the DM as the basis of design for the reinforced concrete structure for the Burj Khalifa project.
  • Structural Steel Design Standard: The structural steel spire was designed for gravity, wind, seismic and fatigue in accordance with the requirements of the American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) Load and Resistance Factor Design Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (1999).
  • Seismic Design Parameters: The DM specified Dubai as a Uniform Building Code UBC-97 Zone 2a seismic region with a seismic zone factor Z = 0.15 and soil profile Sc.
Figure 2 - Typical Floor Plan
Figure 2 – Typical Floor Plan

Architectural Design of the Burj Khalifa

The context of the Burj Khalifa being located in the city of Dubai, UAE, drove the inspiration for the building form to incorporate cultural and historical particular to the region. The influences of the Middle Eastern domes and pointed arches in traditional buildings, as well as spiral imagery in Middle Eastern architecture, resulted in the tri-axial geometry of the Burj Khalifa and the tower’s spiral reduction with height.

The Y-shaped plan is ideal for residential and hotel usage, with the wings allowing maximum outward views and inward natural light.

The exterior cladding is comprised of reflective glazing with aluminum and textured stainless steel spandrel panels and stainless-steel vertical tubular fins. Close to 26,000 glass panels, each individually hand-cut, were used in the exterior cladding of Burj Khalifa. The cladding system is designed to withstand Dubai’s extreme summer heat.

Burj Khalifa utilizes 57 elevators and eight escalators. The building service/fireman’s elevator has a capacity of 5,500 kg (12,100 pounds). Traveling at 10 meters per second (22 miles per hour), the observation elevators have the world’s longest travel distance from lowest to highest stop.

Figure 3 - Burj Khalifa Construction
Figure 3 – Burj Khalifa Construction

Structural System Description

The designers at Skidmore, Owings and Merrill (SOM) in Chicago purposely shaped the structural concrete Burj Khalifa – “Y” shaped – to reduce the wind forces on the tower, as well as to keep the structure simple and foster constructability. The structural system can be described as a “buttressed” core. Each wing, with its own high-performance concrete corridor walls and perimeter columns, buttresses the others via a six-sided central core, or hexagonal hub.

Figure 4 - Three-Dimensional Analysis Model (3D View of a Single Story)
Figure 4 – Three-Dimensional Analysis Model (3D View of a Single Story)

The result is a tower that is extremely stiff laterally and torsionally. SOM applied a rigorous geometry to the tower that aligned all the common central core, wall and column elements. This allows the construction to proceed without the normal difficulties associated with column transfers.

Over 200,000 cubic yards of concrete were required to construct the structure. This is enough to build a solid cube 180 feet on a side or a 700-mile-long sidewalk.

Outriggers at the mechanical floors allow the columns to participate in the lateral load resistance of the structure; hence, all the vertical concrete is utilized efficiently to support both gravity and lateral loads.  The wall concrete specified strengths ranged from C60 to C80 cube strength (7,000 psi to 9,300 psi cylinder strength) and utilized a binary mix of Portland cement and fly ash.

The wall thickness and column sizes were fine-tuned to reduce the effects of creep and shrinkage on the individual elements which comprise the structure. Concrete creep is the continued deformation of a concrete structure under sustained load (basically, long-term pressure or stress on concrete can make it change shape).

To reduce the effects of differential column shortening (due to creep of the concrete) between the perimeter columns and interior walls, the perimeter columns were sized such that the self-weight gravity stress on the perimeter columns matched the stress on the interior corridor walls.

Figure 5 - Reinforced Concrete Structure
Figure 5 – Reinforced Concrete Structure

The five sets of outriggers, distributed up the building, tie all the vertical load-carrying elements together, further ensuring uniform gravity stresses; hence, reducing differential creep movements. Since the shrinkage in concrete occurs more quickly in thinner walls or columns, the perimeter column thickness of 600 mm (24 inches) matched the typical corridor wall thickness (similar volume to surface ratios) to ensure the columns and walls will generally shorten at the same rate due to concrete shrinkage.

Due to the compatibility requirements of strain between the rebar and the concrete in a reinforced concrete column, as the concrete creeps and shrinks (i.e., shortens), the rebar must attract additional compressive stress and forces to maintain the same strain as the concrete.  Since the total load is the same, over time, part of the load in a reinforced concrete column is transferred from the concrete to the rebar.

This unloading of the concrete, therefore, also reduces the creep in the concrete.

Figure 6 - Exchange of Gravity Axial Force Between Concrete and Rebar vs. Time
Figure 6 – Exchange of Gravity Axial Force Between Concrete and Rebar vs. Time

The crowning touch of Burj Khalifa is its telescopic spire. The structural steel spire was constructed from inside the building and jacked to its full height of over 200 meters (700 feet) using a hydraulic pump.

In addition to securing Burj Khalifa’s place as the world’s tallest structure, the spire is integral to the overall design, creating a sense of completion for the landmark, and also houses communications equipment.

Figure 7 - 3D View of Analysis Model
Figure 7 – 3D View of Analysis Model

Foundations and Site Conditions of the Burj Khalifa

If you want to build high, you must first dig deep.

Figure 8 - Reinforced Concrete Raft Pour
Figure 8 – Reinforced Concrete Raft Pour

The groundbreaking of Burj Khalifa occurred in September 2004. The tower’s foundations consist of a pile-supported raft/mat. The solid reinforced concrete raft is 3.7 meters (12 feet) thick and was poured utilizing C50 cube strength (5,800 psi cylinder) self-consolidating concrete (SCC). The raft was constructed in four separate pours (three wings and the center core). Each raft pour occurred over at least a 24-hour period.

Figure 9 - SCC Concrete Flow Table Testing
Figure 9 – SCC Concrete Flow Table Testing

Wind Engineering

For a building of this height and slenderness, wind forces and the resulting motions in the upper levels become dominant factors in the structural design. An extensive program of wind tunnel tests and other studies were undertaken by Rowan Williams Davies and Irwin Inc.’s (RWDI) boundary layer wind tunnels in Guelph, Ontario.

The wind tunnel program included rigid-model force balance tests, full multi-degree-of-freedom aeroelastic model studies, measurements of localized pressures, pedestrian wind environment studies and wind climatic studies. Wind tunnel models account for the crosswind effects of wind-induced vortex shedding on the building.

Figure 10 - Vortex Shedding Behavior
Figure 10 – Vortex Shedding Behavior

In addition to the structural loading tests, the Burj Khalifa tower was studied by RWDI for cladding, pedestrian level and stack effect.

Based on the results of the aeroelastic models, the predicted building motions are within the ISO standard recommended values without the need for auxiliary damping.

Figure 11 - Wind Behavior
Figure 11 – Wind Behavior

Reaching New Heights with the Burj Khalifa

The world’s tallest structure, the Burj Khalifa, is a focal point of the overall development project, which includes shopping malls, hotels and residential buildings.

The architects and engineers utilized the latest in building codes and standards to develop the building form and the structural system, resulting in a tower that efficiently manages its response to the wind, while maintaining the integrity of the design concept.

It represents a significant achievement in terms of utilizing the latest design, codes, materials and construction technology and methods, to provide an efficient, rational structure to rise to heights never before seen.

Figure 12 - Tower Massing
Figure 12 – Tower Massing

The Burj Khalifa Project Team

  • Owner: Emaar Properties PJSC
  • Project Manager: Turner Construction International
  • Architect/Structural Engineers/MEP Engineers: Skidmore, Owings & Merrill LLP
  • Adopting Architect & Engineer/Field Supervision: Hyder Consulting Ltd.
  • Independent Verification and Testing Agency: GHD Global Pty. Ltd.
  • General Contractor: Samsung; BeSix; Arabtec
  • Foundation Contractor: NASA Multiplex

References

  • Baker, Korista, & Novak (2011), “Engineering the World’s Tallest – Burj Dubai”, paper in “The Broadview Anthology of Expository Prose, second edition”, Broadview Press, pp 643-653.
  • Baker, Korista, Novak, Pawlikowski & Young (2007), “Creep & Shrinkage and the Design of Supertall Buildings – A Case Study: The Burj Khalifa Tower”, ACI SP-246: Structural Implications of Shrinkage and Creep of Concrete.
  • Dubai Building Code, 2021 Edition, Published by the Government of Dubai.
  • Irwin, Baker, Korista, Weismantle & Novak (2006), “The Burj Khalifa Tower: Wind Tunnel Testing of Cladding and Pedestrian Level”, Structure Magazine, published by NCSEA, November 2006, pp 47-50.
About the Author
Lawrence C. Novak, S.E., F.SEI, CERT, LEED AP, is the chief structural engineer in the Codes and Standards Development division in the International Code Council’s Central Regional Office. Novak has over 35 years of experience supporting the advancement of codes and standards. In his free time, Larry enjoys presenting exciting interactive presentations to students of all ages, to bring structural concepts to life with the goal to inspire the next generation of young minds to achieve new heights.
Submissions
Check out upcoming BSJ topics and send us articles for consideration:
Or send by email

Want to advertise in the BSJ?
Click Here

Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin

  • 25 24862 MTS CLE BSJ WAD 270X270 FINAL
  • 25 24731 BSM BSJ Website 270x270 WAD FINAL
  • 25 24651 TRN WDS BSJ BSJW WAD 270x270 FINAL a
  • tile 3
  • 25 24699 PD TRN SKGA Sub Plan BSJ WAD FINAL 270 x 270 2
International Code Council
International Code Council
International Code Council
International Code Council

Subscribe to the Building Safety Journal

Subscribe

Connect with Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • X
  • YouTube
  • Instagram

ICC Family of Solutions

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact Us
  • Accessibility Policy
UitUIDbJeErG9ZG3ZEspGg6ex4DQ2TJujAg0tOC5pPI=.html