Skip to Main Content
Building Safety Journal Logo

Building Safety Journal - International Code Council

Main Menu

Menu

      • April, 2025 Articles
      • March, 2025 Articles
      • February, 2025 Articles
      • January, 2025 Articles
      • December, 2024 Articles
      • November, 2024 Articles
      • 2025 Articles
      • 2024 Articles
      • Deep Dives
      • Member News
      • Personal Perspectives
      • Quick Hits
      • Technical Topics
      • Press Releases
      • Sponsored Content
      • View All
      • Buildings, Construction, Architecture/Design
      • Fire, Wildland-Urban Interface
      • Plumbing, Mechanical, Fuel Gas, Pools/Spas
      • Energy, Solar, Green, Sustainability
      • Disaster Preparedness, Mitigation, Resiliency
  • Subscribe
    • ICC Family of Solutions
    • ICCSafe
    • myICC
    • Digital Codes
    • cdpACCESS
    • Store
    • Support

Join today!

Keep up-to-date on crucial industry news, innovative training and expert technical advice with a free subscription to the award-winning Building Safety Journal.

Subscribe

Sign In or Register Here

Provide your email address
Provide your password
Answer the math challenge
Please enter your e-mail address below. We will email you a link to reset your password.
Provide your email address
Answer the math challenge
To complete your registration, please verify your email address.
Answer the math challenge

We have emailed the address you provided. Please click the link in the email to confirm your email address.

Your account has been marked for password reset. Please change your password.
Provide your new password
Verify your new password
Answer the math challenge 5 minus four

Only registered ICC members have access to this article at this time.

Explore all the benefits that ICC Membership has to offer and become a member today to gain access to this exciting content.

If you're already an ICC member Sign In Now.

Can We Help?

  • Reset My Password
  • I Need More Help

California experiences back-to-back earthquakes

July 8th, 2019
by Susan Dowty
  • Quick Hits

Welcome to Searles ValleyCalifornia is on edge after a series of earthquakes, including two major back-to-back temblors, struck a remote part of the Mojave Desert region during the Fourth of July holiday weekend. At 10:33 a.m. local time on Thursday, July 4, 2019, a 6.4 magnitude quake struck a sparsely populated area about 122 miles northeast of Los Angeles and just 11 miles northeast of the city of Ridgecrest. It was the most powerful earthquake to hit Southern California in nearly 20 years and was felt as far away as Ensenada and Mexicali in Mexico; Las Vegas and Reno in Nevada; Phoenix, Ariz.; and Chico and Oceanside in California. That quake was followed by more than 400 aftershocks — ranging in magnitude from 2.0 to 5.4 — and scientists from the United States Geological Survey (USGS) warned that a powerful aftershock of the same 6.4 magnitude or greater was a possibility.

Just a day later, at 8:19 p.m. local time, an even larger quake of magnitude 7.1 — which is 11 times more powerful than the July Fourth event and estimated to have been felt by some 15 million people — struck about 6.8 miles northwest of its predecessor and is now among the most powerful quakes in California history since the magnitude 7.1 Hector Mine Earthquake struck the Mojave Desert in 1999. The 6.4 temblor, which occurred in the Little Lake fault zone, is now determined to be a foreshock to the 7.1 Searles Valley Earthquake, which occurred in the Airport Lake Fault Zone; both complex fault zones in the Indian Wells Valley area. Both faults are located about 100 miles northeast of California’s most-feared San Andreas Fault.

The back-to-back quakes left behind more than 50 damaged structures, broken roads, rock slides, obstructed railroad tracks, and leaking water and gas lines in the small Mojave Desert communities of Ridgecrest and Trona. No fatalities or major injuries were reported. About 200 people opted to sleep in emergency shelters as crews canvassed the towns to assess for damage. The Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake in the Mojave Desert — the U.S. Navy’s largest single landholding — was evacuated and operations halted as most employees live off the base and in Ridgecrest. The epicenters of both quakes were on the base, and officials said they are continuing to assess damage.

The sparsely populated location of the Searles Valley Earthquake appeared to mitigate the damage. Only 28,000 people live in the Ridgecrest area, and about 2,000 people live in Trona. Experts said it could have been much worse. A similar temblor in a densely populated urban area — such as the magnitude 6.7 Northridge Earthquake of 1994 or the magnitude 6.0 Napa Valley Earthquake of 2014 — would have undoubtedly meant deaths and severe property damage in the billions, according to the California Earthquake Authority.

A team of structural engineers and geologists — including engineers from the Structural Engineers Association of Southern California — conducting reconnaissance in coordination with the Earthquake Engineering Research Institute’s Earthquake Clearinghouse have observed that much of the residential damage sustained in the two recent earthquakes correlates to the age of the homes. In Trona where the building stock dates back to the 1930s–50s, there was increased damage. More modern buildings in Ridgecrest fared better, with most damages observed being limited to nonstructural elements or contents. However, additional aftershocks may increase damage, cause older homes to shake off their foundation, or cause the collapse of buildings or structures that were compromised during this recent significant event.

Existing buildings that are not significantly renovated or altered to protect against earthquakes are the single biggest contributor to seismic risk in the United States today. Certain types of buildings, such as unreinforced masonry structures, have performed poorly in past earthquakes and are known to be particularly hazardous. Some local governments in high-hazard areas have enacted ordinances mandating that owners evaluate and retrofit these buildings.

Seismic retrofitting of vulnerable structures is critical to reducing risk. It is important for protecting the lives and assets of building occupants and the continuity of their work. On the whole, communities with more retrofitted structures can recover from earthquakes more rapidly and there is no more important factor in reducing a community’s risk from an earthquake than the adoption and enforcement of up-to-date building codes.

“It is a wake-up call for the rest of the state and other parts of the nation, frankly,” said California Governor Gavin Newsom during a press conference and tour of the affected region. Newsom said that much of the damage can’t be seen by walking down the street, but only by walking through people’s homes. “It’s deceiving, earthquake damage. You don’t notice it at first.” It is estimated that economic damage will be in excess of $100 million. And recovering from structural damage to a home or even broken windows or appliances is a costly financial burden for individuals and small businesses. Newsom said the state and federal governments are committed to the community’s recovery and declared a commitment to better prepare for earthquakes, including strengthening alert systems and building codes.

About the Author
Susan Dowty
Susan M. Dowty, P.E., S.E., is a regional manager in the Government Relations department of the International Code Council. She brings more than 30 years of experience in the administration, development and interpretation of building code provisions. She is a previous California Building Standards Commission member and a former staff engineer for the Code Council's legacy organization in California. Dowty currently serves a three-year term (2019-2022) on the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP) Advisory Committee on Earthquake Hazard Reduction (ACEHR).
Submissions
Check out upcoming BSJ topics and send us articles for consideration:
Or send by email

Want to advertise in the BSJ?
Click Here

Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin

  • 25 24731 BSM BSJ Website 270x270 WAD FINAL
  • 25 24651 TRN WDS BSJ BSJW WAD 270x270 FINAL a
  • 24 24393 TRN Learn Live Subscription BSJ AD 270x270 FINAL c
  • tile 3
  • 25 24699 PD TRN SKGA Sub Plan BSJ WAD FINAL 270 x 270 2
International Code Council
International Code Council
International Code Council
International Code Council

Subscribe to the Building Safety Journal

Subscribe

Connect with Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • X
  • YouTube
  • Instagram

ICC Family of Solutions

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact Us
  • Accessibility Policy
Q-zmNKndUCZsljF09rMU_25Ed8-gnPNt-zLqMsVM9Uc=.html