Skip to Main Content
Building Safety Journal Logo

Building Safety Journal - International Code Council

Main Menu

Menu

      • June, 2025 Articles
      • May, 2025 Articles
      • April, 2025 Articles
      • March, 2025 Articles
      • February, 2025 Articles
      • January, 2025 Articles
      • 2025 Articles
      • 2024 Articles
      • Deep Dives
      • Member News
      • Personal Perspectives
      • Quick Hits
      • Technical Topics
      • Press Releases
      • Sponsored Content
      • View All
      • Buildings, Construction, Architecture/Design
      • Fire, Wildland-Urban Interface
      • Plumbing, Mechanical, Fuel Gas, Pools/Spas
      • Energy, Solar, Green, Sustainability
      • Disaster Preparedness, Mitigation, Resiliency
  • Subscribe
    • ICC Family of Solutions
    • ICCSafe
    • myICC
    • Digital Codes
    • cdpACCESS
    • Store
    • Support

Join today!

Keep up-to-date on crucial industry news, innovative training and expert technical advice with a free subscription to the award-winning Building Safety Journal.

Subscribe

Sign In or Register Here

Provide your email address
Provide your password
Answer the math challenge
Please enter your e-mail address below. We will email you a link to reset your password.
Provide your email address
Answer the math challenge
To complete your registration, please verify your email address.
Answer the math challenge

We have emailed the address you provided. Please click the link in the email to confirm your email address.

Your account has been marked for password reset. Please change your password.
Provide your new password
Verify your new password
Answer the math challenge 5 minus zero

Only registered ICC members have access to this article at this time.

Explore all the benefits that ICC Membership has to offer and become a member today to gain access to this exciting content.

If you're already an ICC member Sign In Now.

Can We Help?

  • Reset My Password
  • I Need More Help

Gone in a flash: Northern California rebuilds

June 29th, 2018
by Nick Reiher
  • Deep Dives

Building officialsBuilding officials, code officials and permit techs know working “the counter” can be difficult. You never know what kind of questions you’re going to get, and chances are the people on the other side of the counter may not like the answers.

But for the past several months, those officials in Northern California have had to do more than simply process permits; they have had to serve as counselors as well, listening to heartbreaking stories of victims of fires that consumed their homes and, in some cases, loved ones and pets.

For weeks in October, Northern California counties — specifically Napa, Lake, Sonoma, Mendocino, Butte and Solano — were the national media focus, as about 250 separate fires fueled by 50 to 60 mph winds, single-digit humidity, and dry wood and brush reached temperatures of up to 2,000 degrees in some areas.

In all, the fires destroyed nearly 9,000 structures and leveled more than 200,000 acres. Officials say many of the more than 40 people who died and nearly 200 injured suffered their fates during the first hours of the fires, which began late in the evening on Oct. 8, 2017.

OfficeA third of those lost homes were in Sonoma County and the city of Santa Rosa. Officials in the city have been helping people get back in their homes and businesses since November. Like the county, they’ve set up a one-stop shop, where fire victims can find out what they need to do to rebuild.

“With the idea of a safe built environment, we do everything we can do to help these people, rather than be another burden to them,” said Mike Renner, a consultant whose group, West Coast Code Consultants, Inc., was hired by Sonoma County to help with the barrage of permits.

Renner and his colleagues have been working since mid-February to help people get back into their homes. About half of the victims who originally came in just needed to know the process, he said, while others, whose homes had substantial damage, losing all records among their possessions, needed to start from scratch.

That can include having to find their original deeds and plans for their homes. Many of those homes were built in the 1970s, so homeowners wanting to rebuild on the old site — and most do — found that codes updated since then, codes that possibly could have helped mitigate some of their losses, are adding thousands of dollars to the cost of their rebuild.

The responses and demeanors are varied when victims walk in to the permit center; some hold it together pretty well, “Just tell me what I need to do.”

Others are in shock; still others would do fine until one or more parts of the rebuild process became a final straw that had them shaking and sobbing.

“It’s very emotional,” Renner said.

Resiliency Permit CenterAmong that first group, some were living in cars, others in motels or with family. Some rented recreational vehicles so they could camp on the land where their house once stood — once officials from the Federal Emergency Management Agency approved the soil remediation.

“People want to get back into their community,” Renner said.

But there are obstacles. Some home sites lost their underground plumbing and gas lines, as back hoes dug too deeply during remediation. A lot of people still haven’t settled with their insurance companies, said Renner’s colleague, Marcus Johnson.

And then there is the shortage of labor and materials to rebuild, Johnson said, something that helped result in a major housing shortage in Northern California even before the fires.

Even with scores of people wanting to live in the Sonoma/Napa region due to its beauty and lower cost of living relative to the Bay Area, Johnson said housing developers have been slow to get back into the market after losing money during the recession.

Homes are beginning to go up, as a couple hundred permits have been approved, Johnson said, but those wanting to rebuild already are having a hard time finding labor and materials, “and it’s only going to get worse.”

Broken carToward mid-June, the city of Santa Rosa saw construction beginning on its first rebuild, approved back in November, said Jesse Oswald, permit intake manager for the city’s building division. Initially, they — and representatives of 30 different agencies — were working 15–16 hours a day, handling questions from dazed victims.

“We spent a lot of time listening,” he said. “Telling them it’s going to be okay.”

Oswald remembered talking to one contractor who also was a victim of the fire, literally chased from his home by rushing flames.

“He told me from the time the fire reached one window until it consumed the house was 32 seconds,” Oswald said. “In some cases, nothing could have stopped this.”

In some places, the wind-whipped fires got so hot fire sprinklers malfunctioned, or melted.

But in general, officials said, homes that had a 100-foot clearance of trees and other landscaping fared much better than those not adhering to that and other measures in the state’s Wildland Urban Interface provisions, based on the International Code Council’s International Wildland-Urban Interface Code, adopted in 2012, and Chapter 7A of the California Building Code.

Those provisions mandate sprinklers, fire-resistant construction materials for homes, as well as porches and decks that many homeowners like to build with treated redwood.

While retrofitting building materials, and even sprinklers, may have been too costly, it would have been easy for residents in homes, even those built decades ago, to clear that 100-foot radius, but, Oswald said, “homeowners want their lush surroundings.”

The lives and most of the possessions lost in the wildfires during just a few days can never be recovered. For the homes and businesses, officials estimate it will take five to seven years to rebuild.

Oswald said the real effects of the labor and material shortage probably won’t hit for another year as permits for even more homes are approved once homeowners settle with their insurance companies.

Assuming no other such disasters, he said, it could take five to 10 years for that full build-out.

To make things as easy as possible, Oswald said, people reviewing the permits are re-doing the way they’ve done things for years, being more flexible in code interpretations, while at the same time making sure rebuilding will be done safely and by reputable companies.

“We won’t stand on any one precedent,” he said. “We’ll be flexible, without diminishing any safety. Not everything fits in one box.”

View photos from the site visit.

About the Author
Nick Reiher, a 1981 graduate of the Medill School of Journalism, has spent the past 40 years in community news. He joined the International Code Council as a freelance writer in August 2011.
Submissions
Check out upcoming BSJ topics and send us articles for consideration:
Or send by email

Want to advertise in the BSJ?
Click Here

Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin

  • 25 24862 MTS CLE BSJ WAD 270X270 FINAL
  • 25 24651 TRN WDS BSJ BSJW WAD 270x270 FINAL a
  • 25 24699 PD TRN SKGA Sub Plan BSJ WAD FINAL 270 x 270 2
  • 24 23932 CORP MEM Online Community 270x270 WAD FINAL 1
  • ICC Updated Ad 270 x 270 px 1
International Code Council
International Code Council
International Code Council
International Code Council

Subscribe to the Building Safety Journal

Subscribe

Connect with Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • X
  • YouTube
  • Instagram

ICC Family of Solutions

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact Us
  • Accessibility Policy
PBsNFZABusyjGi1NZj2rTc4i5mqVhrrTy16fFASvs6k=.html