Skip to Main Content
Building Safety Journal Logo

Building Safety Journal - International Code Council

Main Menu

Menu

      • April, 2025 Articles
      • March, 2025 Articles
      • February, 2025 Articles
      • January, 2025 Articles
      • December, 2024 Articles
      • November, 2024 Articles
      • 2025 Articles
      • 2024 Articles
      • Deep Dives
      • Member News
      • Personal Perspectives
      • Quick Hits
      • Technical Topics
      • Press Releases
      • Sponsored Content
      • View All
      • Buildings, Construction, Architecture/Design
      • Fire, Wildland-Urban Interface
      • Plumbing, Mechanical, Fuel Gas, Pools/Spas
      • Energy, Solar, Green, Sustainability
      • Disaster Preparedness, Mitigation, Resiliency
  • Subscribe
    • ICC Family of Solutions
    • ICCSafe
    • myICC
    • Digital Codes
    • cdpACCESS
    • Store
    • Support

Join today!

Keep up-to-date on crucial industry news, innovative training and expert technical advice with a free subscription to the award-winning Building Safety Journal.

Subscribe

Sign In or Register Here

Provide your email address
Provide your password
Answer the math challenge
Please enter your e-mail address below. We will email you a link to reset your password.
Provide your email address
Answer the math challenge
To complete your registration, please verify your email address.
Answer the math challenge

We have emailed the address you provided. Please click the link in the email to confirm your email address.

Your account has been marked for password reset. Please change your password.
Provide your new password
Verify your new password
Answer the math challenge 7 plus nine

Only registered ICC members have access to this article at this time.

Explore all the benefits that ICC Membership has to offer and become a member today to gain access to this exciting content.

If you're already an ICC member Sign In Now.

Can We Help?

  • Reset My Password
  • I Need More Help

Tall mass timber provisions represent historic new building code requirements

August 10th, 2020
by Buddy Showalter
  • Technical Topics

When was the last time a new construction type was added to the building code? The 2021 International Building Code (IBC) will include three new construction types: IV-A, IV-B and IV-C, representing historic new building code requirements. Both the IBC and 2021 International Fire Code (IFC) include important changes in material technologies and approved uses proposed by the International Code Council’s Ad Hoc Committee on Tall Wood Buildings (TWB).

The three new types of construction are defined and included in Section 602.4, Chapter 6 — Types of Construction of the 2021 IBC. Additionally, requirements were added to other chapters of the IBC, including Chapter 5 — General Building Heights and Areas, Chapter 7 — Fire and Smoke Protection Features, Chapter 17 — Special Inspections and Tests, Chapter 23 — Wood, and Chapter 33 — Safeguards During Construction, among others. Collectively, these new requirements allow the use of mass timber and cross-laminated timber (a type of mass timber) for buildings of taller heights, more stories above grade and greater allowable areas compared to existing provisions for heavy timber buildings. Up to 18 stories and 270 feet for Type IV-A construction in certain occupancies.

 

Business Occupancy. Fully sprinklered, no open perimeter

 

 

History of construction types

The 1927 Uniform Building Code (UBC) — published by the legacy model code organization the International Conference of Building Officials — included five construction types as shown in the table. In the 1949 UBC, “Type IV — Metal Frame” was changed to “Type IV — Light Incombustible Frame.” The 1952 UBC introduced Table 17-A, a precursor to IBC Table 601, which redefined construction types based on fire-resistive requirements. In the 1976 UBC, Table 17-A was revised to define Types I and II as noncombustible and Types III, IV and V as combustible. This format remained through the 1997 UBC.

The 1950 Abridged Building Code (ABC) — published by the legacy model code organization Building Officials & Code Administrators International (BOCA) — included four main construction types. These were carried into the 1955 BOCA  Basic Building Code (BBC) where designations for Types 3 and 4 were added. By 1975, the BOCA National Building Code (NBC) had incorporated construction types in Table 214, similar to IBC Table 601 and further defined protected and unprotected construction types. The 1984 NBC expanded and defined Types 1 and 2 as Noncombustible, Types 3 and 4 as Noncombustible/Combustible, and Type 5 as Combustible. Each of these construction types was further defined as shown in the table and remained through the 1999 NBC.

The 1946 Southern Standard Building Code (SBC) — published by the legacy model code organization Southern Building Code Congress International — included six construction classifications. In 1976, Types IV, V and VI were further refined to include one-hour protected and unprotected types. These remained through the 1999 SBC.

With consolidation in the 2000 IBC, construction types were merged to create the current classifications. These five types are based on two main groupings, noncombustible construction (Types I and II) and combustible construction (Types III, IV, and V).

 

Table: History of construction types
1927 UBC Type I — Fire-resistive Type II — Heavy Timber Type III — Ordinary Masonry Type IV — Metal Frame Type V — Wood Frame
1952 UBC Type I — Incombustible Type II — Incombustible Type III — Combustible (protected or heavy timber and unprotected) Type IV — Incombustible (protected and unprotected) Type V — Combustible (protected and unprotected)
1976 UBC Type I — Fire-resistive Type II — Fire-resistive, protected and unprotected Type III — protected and unprotected Type IV — Heavy Timber Type V — protected and unprotected
1950 ABC Types I-A & 1-B — Fireproof Types 2-A, 2-B & 2-C — Noncombustible Exterior Masonry Wall Construction Type Frame Construction Type
1955 BBC Types 1-A and 1-B — Fireproof Types 2-A, 2-B and 2-C — Noncombustible Types 3-A, 3-B and 3-C — Exterior Masonry Wall Types 4-A and 4-B — Frame
1975 NBC Type 1 — Fireproof (1A and 1B) Type 2 — Noncombustible Protected (2A and 2B) and Unprotected (2C) Type 3 — Exterior Masonry Walls with Heavy Timbers (3A), Ordinary Protected (3B) and Ordinary Unprotected (3C) Type 4 — Frame Protected (4A) and Unprotected (4B)
1984 NBC Type 1 — Protected (1A and 1B) Type 2 — Protected (2A and 2B) and Unprotected (2C) Type 3 — Protected (3A), Unprotected (3B) Type 4 — Heavy Timber Type 5 — Protected (5A) and Unprotected (5B)
1946 SBC Type I – Fireproof Type II – Fire-resistive Type III – Heavy Timber Type IV – Noncombustible Frame Type V – Ordinary Type VI – Wood Frame
1976 SBC Type I – Fireproof Type II – Fire-resistive Type III – Heavy Timber Type IV – Noncombustible Frame (one-hour protected and unprotected) Type V – Ordinary (one-hour protected and unprotected) Type VI – Wood Frame (one-hour protected and unprotected)
2000 IBC Type I – Protected (I-A) and Unprotected (I-B) Type II – Protected (II-A) and Unprotected (II-B) Type III – Protected (III-A) and Unprotected (III-B) Type IV – Heavy Timber Type V – Protected (V-A) and Unprotected (V-B)

Note: UBC — Uniform Building Code (ICBO); ABC — Abridged Building Code (BOCA); BBC — Basic Building Code (BOCA); NBC — National Building Code (BOCA); SBC — Standard Building Code (SBCCI); IBC — International Building Code (ICC).

 

So, while construction types have evolved over the years, the introduction of three new construction types is relatively unprecedented in the building code. Because of the close relationship to traditional heavy timber, the established variants were Type IV-A for buildings with structural elements completely protected with noncombustible protection, Type IV-B for buildings with structural elements mostly protected with noncombustible protection and Type IV-C for buildings with most structural elements left unprotected. Even in Type IV-C, noncombustible protection is required for concealed spaces, shaft walls and the exterior surface of outside walls.

 

ICC Tall Wood Building Ad Hoc Committee

Given the anticipated demand for taller mass timber buildings, it was deemed in the best interest of the building safety community to develop comprehensive and enforceable construction requirements. At the July 9, 2015, meeting of the Code Council Board of Directors, the American Wood Council requested the establishment of a technical committee to study the introduction of building and fire code requirements to permit construction of taller mass timber buildings. Consistent with Council Policy #07-04, anyone may petition the Code Council board for the establishment of a technical committee when “…an issue of concern to the International Code Council” is brought to their attention. The Code Council board decided to survey its membership on the need and support to study tall wood buildings during the fall of 2015. “The Code Council board carefully considered more than 160 comments from stakeholders prior to establishing this committee,” explained Code Council Board President Alex “Cash” Olszowy, III. “Many of the comments emphasized the need for the Code Council to comprehensively investigate all aspects of this new construction technology, acknowledging its design flexibility, significant sustainability attributes and the potential economic impact to our nation’s built environment.”[1]

In recognition of the array of benefits provided by large mass timber buildings, but also cognizant of the fire safety implications of taller buildings constructed with combustible materials, the Code Council board established the Ad Hoc Committee on Tall Wood Buildings (AHC-TWB) in December 2015. The AHC-TWB was tasked with exploring the building science of mass timber and, if supported by the science, investigating the feasibility of, and act on, developing code changes for safe tall mass timber buildings. Any such proposals were to provide assurance to the public and the fire service that code-compliant tall mass timber buildings have rigorous and redundant systems of fire protection, both passive and active, suitable for the mission of protecting the public and fire responders.

More than 60 applications were received for membership on the AHC-TWB. In March 2016, the Code Council board announced committee appointments. The AHC-TWB was ideally suited to the task of exploring the science and creating proposed code changes, consisting of subject matter experts, including members of building departments, architects, structural engineers, representatives of testing laboratories, representatives of multiple structural materials, and the fire service, including firefighters, fire chiefs, and fire protection engineers.[2]

Consistent with the professional expertise and stakeholder interest of the AHC-TWB, a rigorous set of performance objectives was adopted to provide guidance in the development of code change proposals. Those performance objectives were:

  • No collapse under reasonable scenarios of complete burn-out of fuel without automatic sprinkler protection being considered.
  • No unusually high radiation exposure from the subject building to adjoining properties to present a risk of ignition under reasonably severe fire scenarios.
  • No unusual response from typical radiation exposure from adjacent properties to present a risk of ignition of the subject building under reasonably severe fire scenarios.
  • No unusual fire department access issues.
  • Egress systems designed to protect building occupants during the design escape time, plus a factor of safety.
  • Highly reliable fire suppression systems to reduce the risk of failure during reasonably expected fire scenarios. The degree of reliability should be proportional to evacuation time (height) and the risk of collapse.
The TWB-AHC determined fire testing was necessary to validate established performance objectives. Consequently, five full-scale, multiple-story fire tests were conducted to simulate the three new construction types (Types IV-A, IV-B and IV-C) at the ATF Fire Research Laboratory.
The TWB-AHC determined fire testing was necessary to validate established performance objectives. Consequently, five full-scale, multiple-story fire tests were conducted to simulate the three new construction types (Types IV-A, IV-B and IV-C) at the ATF Fire Research Laboratory.

To address these criteria, and in response to the very large body of technical subject matter to evaluate, four workgroups were formed; anyone with an interest in tall mass timber buildings could participate. These workgroups included: Standards/Definitions, Fire, Code (Height and Area) and Structural. AHC-TWB members were surveyed to develop an extensive list of issues and concerns to be addressed during the study period. Eighty-two specific items were identified and assigned to the most appropriate workgroup. Each issue was thoroughly discussed at the workgroup level and findings were provided during each of nine in-person meetings held by the AHC-TWB over the course of three-and-a-half years of study.

As anticipated, the greatest challenge for the AHC-TWB involved developing an approach to compensate for the combustible nature of the material while recognizing its inherent fire resistance and fire performance. The first step was to develop a protection system that would result in a performance akin to that of existing Type I-B construction,  then, assigning fire resistance requirements to a proposed new construction type (IV-B) for mass timber buildings. The same process was used to evaluate IV-A and IV-C in turn.

 

Fire research

One AHC-TWB guiding principle was that it would not propose any requirement that had not been tested and they determined fire testing was necessary to validate their established performance objectives. Consequently five, full-scale, multiple-story fire tests were developed to simulate the three new construction types (Types IV-A, IV-B and IV-C). The successful results of those tests, as well as testing for structural performance in accordance with ASTM E 119, Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials, and additional testing by others, helped establish the basis upon which the AHC-TWB developed new mass timber code provisions.

 

Mass Timber Buildings and the IBC

Mass Timber Buildings and the IBCIn July 2020, a document titled Mass Timber Buildings and the IBC was published cooperatively by the American Wood Council and International Code Council culminating several years of effort. This document provides an overview of provisions for mass timber construction as found primarily in the IBC. Cross-laminated timber (CLT) is a relatively new engineered wood product increasingly being found in U.S. construction markets. Changes to the 2015 IBC to recognize CLT and reorganization of heavy timber provisions in the 2018 IBC set the stage for historic changes in the 2021 IBC and International Fire Code (IFC) for tall mass timber construction.

This document is valuable for instructor-led programs on mass timber and new tall mass timber design and construction. For training, the document, the IBC and material standards can be the basis for instruction. Similar to ICC Significant Changes documents, each chapter begins with a summary, the specific sections of the code under consideration and background on the code change significance or topic being discussed. Each chapter addresses specific IBC chapters where mass timber construction is applicable and may include provisions from the 2015, 2018, and 2021 IBC (or 2021 IFC or 2021 IECC).

 

Tall mass timber special inspector certification

As noted, the 2021 IBC will include new provisions in Chapter 17 for special inspection of tall mass timber buildings. Realizing the need for people experienced and knowledgeable in this new area of construction, ICC established an Exam Development Committee (EDC) responsible for developing the certification exam for Tall Mass Timber Special Inspectors. The EDC is already hard at work (virtually of course) developing and scoring exam questions with a goal to launch the new program on PRONTO this fall.

“Our committee has had some insightful discussions during the development of this exam and we are very excited to see this exam come to fruition,” said Eirene Knott, MCP, CBO, CFM, chair of the Tall Mass Timber Special Inspector Exam Development Committee and director of Code Services for BRR Architecture. “It is an honor to serve as a chair of this committee as we create a new exam for a newly created construction type. We feel it further serves the vision and mission of the Code Council.”

Ray O’Brocki, Manager of Fire Service Relations for AWC and member of the Tall Mass Timber EDC had this to say about the special inspector certification program: “Because adhering to the building code is essential in all types of construction, the American Wood Council is eager to work with ICC in the development of the Mass Timber Special Inspector curriculum. This type of construction is a sea change in tall building construction. The special inspector certification will ensure that the individuals conducting these inspections will have the necessary knowledge to verify critical elements of a mass timber building were constructed safely and as per the code.”

 

Training

Several full-day webinars on new tall mass timber provisions have been provided via ICC’s learning center. Also a cooperative effort between ICC and AWC, the course dovetails with Mass Timber Buildings and the IBC. Attend a full-day virtual course in August or November and receive the book and six hours of education credit.

 

Conclusion

Back to the original question about the last time a new construction type was added to the codes. Perhaps this is a first. Are we seeing history in the making? These are exciting times in the code development world!

 


 

[1] ICC Accepting Applications for Ad Hoc Committee on Tall Wood Buildings. International Code Council. January 6, 2016.
[2]  https://www.iccsafe.org/wp-content/uploads/com_coun/roster_TWB.pdf

About the Author
Buddy Showalter
Buddy Showalter is a senior staff engineer with the Code Council's product development group. He develops technical resources in support of the structural provisions of the International Building Code and International Residential Code. Showalter reviews publications authored by the Code Council and engineering groups, while also developing publications and technical seminars on the structural provisions of the International Codes for building departments, design engineers and special inspectors. He is the project lead in the development of Mass Timber Buildings and the IBC and associated education programs, jointly developed by the Code Council and the American Wood Council. A graduate of Virginia Tech, Showalter has also been a member of the editorial board for STRUCTURE magazine for more than 15 years. Before joining the Code Council, Showalter spent 26 years with the American Wood Council where he oversaw its technology transfer program with oversight responsibility for publications, website, helpdesk, education and other technical media. He has more than 34 years of experience in the development and support of building codes and standards, publishing more than 60 technical articles for industry-related trade journals.
Submissions
Check out upcoming BSJ topics and send us articles for consideration:
Or send by email

Want to advertise in the BSJ?
Click Here

Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin

  • 25 24731 BSM BSJ Website 270x270 WAD FINAL
  • 25 24651 TRN WDS BSJ BSJW WAD 270x270 FINAL a
  • 24 24393 TRN Learn Live Subscription BSJ AD 270x270 FINAL c
  • tile 3
  • 25 24699 PD TRN SKGA Sub Plan BSJ WAD FINAL 270 x 270 2
International Code Council
International Code Council
International Code Council
International Code Council

Subscribe to the Building Safety Journal

Subscribe

Connect with Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • X
  • YouTube
  • Instagram

ICC Family of Solutions

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact Us
  • Accessibility Policy
IbMXPzSX2UC8GF6bc9gn5JeMq0c8bi1UYfHvfX5uEUA=.html