The proven benefits of modern building codes
Explore 236 studies and reports documenting the economic, safety, and resilience value of I-Codes — filtered by state and hazard topic.
Filter by State
Hazards & Topics
Regional Construction Starts: Trends, Impacts and Energy Codes
Sarno Goldthwait, C., Westmoreland, L.; Northeast Energy Efficiency Partnerships and Southeast Energy Efficiency Alliance
Neither SEEA nor NEEP identified any evidence supporting the claim that energy codes depress construction activity. In both regions, permit numbers are on the rise, and most states have surpassed their pre-recession peak, despite implementation of updated energy codes.
Do Stronger Energy Codes Move Development to Neighboring Jurisdictions?
Lindburg, A., Kogan, A., LeZaks, J.; Midwest Energy Efficiency Alliance
Using both exploratory data analysis and regression, the study determines that there is likely not a strong or direct correlation between Illinois’s energy code updates and the number of singlefamily permits applied for in Illinois counties that border other states relative to their cross-border counterparts.
Building Costs and House Prices
Potter, B. and Syverson, C.; National Bureau of Economic Research
A long, broad, and theoretically agnostic view toward the connection between building costs and house prices in the US housing market, finding that building costs have never had all that much explanatory power over US housing prices, but even the imperfect correlations of the past have weakened further in recent decades along multiple dimensions.
Do Housing Prices Change with Building Codes?
Awondo, S., Crawford, S., Powell, L.; Culverhouse College of Commerce & Business Administration, University of Alabama
This paper examines whether state-level adoption of newer editions of the International Residential Code is associated with changes in home sale prices.
Construction Costs for Wildfire-Resistant Homes: Altadena, CA Edition (Post-Eaton Fire)
Headwaters Economics; Insurance Institute for Business & Home Safety (IBHS)
Cost analysis of rebuilding in Altadena, California, following the 2025 Eaton Fire. Based on a 1,750 sq ft single-family home with an estimated $500,000 construction cost, found that constructing a wildfire-resistant home adds only about 3% to the total cost of building components most relevant to wildfire mitigation.
Building a Wildfire-Resistant Home: Codes and Costs (Montana Edition)
Headwaters Economics; Insurance Institute for Business & Home Safety (IBHS)
Compared the construction costs of a typical 2,500 sq ft, single-family wildland-urban interface home in southwest Montana to one built with wildfire-resistant materials and design features. Found negligible cost differences between typical and wildfire-resistant construction— establishing that wildfire-resistant building codes do not impose substantial cost burdens.
Construction Costs for a Wildfire Resilient Home: California Edition
Headwaters Economics; Insurance Institute for Business & Home Safety (IBHS)
Cost analysis of building wildfire-resistant homes in California across three resilience levels found that vulnerable areas of a home can be mitigated for less than $3,000 during new construction, demonstrating affordability of beyond-code wildfire resilience.
Performance of IBHS FORTIFIED Home Construction in Hurricane Sally
Awondo, S., Hollans, H., Powell, L., Wade, M.; Center for Risk and Insurance Research (CRIR), University of Alabama; Alabama Department of Insurance
Found FORTIFIED homes suffered significantly less damage and required fewer insurance claims than homes built to standard construction. FORTIFIED homes also outperformed homes built to identical municipal code criteria but lacking third-party FORTIFIED documentation, demonstrating the importance of verification and inspection.
Mitigation Assessment Team Report: Hurricane Ian in Florida — Building Performance Observations, Recommendations, and Technical Guidance (FEMA P-2342)
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Field assessment following Hurricane Ian's 2022 landfall in Florida found that two-thirds (67%) of all Hurricane Ian NFIP residential building and contents claims came from non-elevated buildings, while elevated single-family residences performed substantially better.
The Impact of Building Restrictions on Housing Affordability
Edward L. Glaeser; Joseph Gyourko
Finds that high housing prices are primarily driven by land‑use restrictions and supply constraints, not construction or building code costs. Demonstrates that where housing prices far exceed physical construction costs, regulatory limits on supply are the dominant factor.
Building Codes and Housing
David Listokin (Rutgers University); David B. Hattis (Building Technology Inc.), HUD PD&R
Reviews theory and empirical evidence on whether building codes raise housing costs. Finds that the most rigorous quantitative studies show building codes increase housing costs by approximately 5% or less and have far less impact on affordability than land‑use, zoning, and subdivision regulations.
Impacts of Energy and Construction Codes on Health Outcomes
New Buildings Institute
Analyzes how modern building energy and construction codes improve public health outcomes by reducing heat‑related mortality, improving indoor air quality, lowering exposure to pollutants, and reducing respiratory and cardiovascular illnesses associated with poor building performance.
The Value and Impact of Building Codes
Ellen Vaughan, Jim Turner, (Environmental and Energy Study Institute)
Comprehensive synthesis demonstrating that modern building codes are the most cost‑effective mechanism for protecting public health, safety, and welfare. Reviews lifecycle cost savings, disaster loss avoidance, consumer benefits, and the importance of regular adoption and enforcement of updated model codes.
Report – New Home Cost v. Price Study, Residential Standards, California Building Energy Efficiency Standards
Nehemiah Stone (Benningfield Group) Jerry Nickelsburg and William Yu (UCLA Anderson Forecast), PG&E
The report concluded that construction cost growth is only marginally associated with home value growth and that there is no evidence an increase in construction cost will cause higher home prices in CA. The study determined that home construction costs are highly correlated to the national cost of inputs and there is no significant statistical evidence that CA’s energy efficiency code, Title 24, is associated with home construction costs.
Hurricane Katrina and the Paradoxes of Government Disaster Policy: Bringing About Wise Governmental Decisions for Hazardous Areas
Raymond J. Burby, Annals of the AAPSS
Extensive damage in New Orleans and the trend in increasing numbers and severity of disasters are the wholly predictable (in fact, predicted) outcomes of well-intentioned, but short-sighted, public policy decisions at all levels of government.
Convective Storm Vulnerability: Quantifying the Role of Effective and Well-Enforced Building Codes in Minimizing Missouri Hail Property Damage
Czajkowski, Jeffrey & Simmons, Kevin. Land Economics.
Modeled Missouri hail claim insurance data from 2008 to 2010 consistently indicates that more favorable building codes do in fact matter in reducing hail damage on the order of 10% to 20%.
Mitigation Assessment Team Report: Hurricane Harvey in Texas: Building Performance Observations, Recommendations, and Technical Guidance
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Averaged flood insurance claims were approximately $88,000 lower per building when local floodplain management regulations had been adopted before, rather than after, buildings were constructed.
Impacts of Model Building Energy Codes
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The cumulative full fuel cycle energy savings from energy codes from 2010 through 2040 are 16.75 quads. In terms of financial benefits to consumers from reduced utility bills, energy codes are expected to save $182 billion dollars from 2010 through 2040.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for Wyoming
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Wyoming. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2009 IECC base code is costeffective for residential buildings in all climate zones in Wyoming.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2018 IECC for Wyoming
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2018 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Wyoming. Moving to the 2018 IECC from the current base code of 2009 IECC is cost-effective for single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in all climate zones in Wyoming.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in Wyoming
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 24.1% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 632 of annual utility bill savings for the average Wyoming household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for Wisconsin
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Wisconsin. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2006 IECC base code is costeffective for residential buildings in all climate zones in Wisconsin.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2018 IECC for Wisconsin
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2018 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Wisconsin. Moving to the 2018 IECC from the current base code of 2009 IECC with amendments is cost-effective for single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in all climate zones in Wisconsin.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in Wisconsin
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 21.6% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 632 of annual utility bill savings for the average Wisconsin household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for West Virginia
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in West Virginia. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2009 IECC base code is costeffective for residential buildings in all climate zones in West Virginia.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2018 IECC for West Virginia
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2018 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in West Virginia. Moving to the 2018 IECC from the current base code of 2009 IECC is cost-effective for single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in all climate zones in West Virginia.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in West Virginia
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 27.4% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 817 of annual utility bill savings for the average West Virginia household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for Virginia
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Virginia. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2012 IECC base code is costeffective for residential buildings in all climate zones in Virginia.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2018 IECC for Virginia
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2018 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Virginia. Moving to the 2018 IECC from the current base code of 2015 IECC with amendments is cost-effective for single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in all climate zones in Virginia.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in Virginia
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 17.9% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 413 of annual utility bill savings for the average Virginia household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for Vermont
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Vermont. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2012 IECC base code is costeffective for residential buildings in all climate zones in Vermont.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2018 IECC for Vermont
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2018 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Vermont. Moving to the 2018 IECC from the current base code of 2015 IECC with amendments is cost-effective for single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in all climate zones in Vermont.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in Vermont
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of -4.5% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ -126 of annual utility bill savings for the average Vermont household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for Utah
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Utah. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2012 Utah State Code base code is costeffective for residential buildings in all climate zones in Utah.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2018 IECC for Utah
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2018 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Utah. Moving to the 2018 IECC from the current base code of 2015 IECC with amendments is cost-effective for single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in all climate zones in Utah.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in Utah
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 16.4% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 325 of annual utility bill savings for the average Utah household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for Texas
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Texas. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2009 IECC base code is cost-effective for residential buildings in all climate zones in Texas.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2018 IECC for Texas
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2018 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Texas. Moving to the 2018 IECC from the current base code of 2015 IECC is cost-effective for single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in all climate zones in Texas.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in Texas
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 8.9% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 174 of annual utility bill savings for the average Texas household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for Tennessee
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Tennessee. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2006 IECC base code is costeffective for residential buildings in all climate zones in Tennessee.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2018 IECC for Tennessee
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2018 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Tennessee. Moving to the 2018 IECC from the current base code of 2009 IECC with amendments is cost-effective for single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in all climate zones in Tennessee.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in Tennessee
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 29% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 698 of annual utility bill savings for the average Tennessee household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for South Dakota
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in South Dakota. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2009 IECC base code is cost-effective for residential buildings in all climate zones in South Dakota.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2018 IECC for South Dakota
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2018 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in South Dakota. Moving to the 2018 IECC from the current base code of 2009 IECC is cost-effective for single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in all climate zones in South Dakota.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in South Dakota
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 25.2% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 706 of annual utility bill savings for the average South Dakota household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for South Carolina
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in South Carolina. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2009 IECC base code is costeffective for residential buildings in all climate zones in South Carolina.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2018 IECC for South Carolina
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2018 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in South Carolina. Moving to the 2018 IECC from the current base code of 2009 IECC is cost-effective for single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in all climate zones in South Carolina.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in South Carolina
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 25.2% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 659 of annual utility bill savings for the average South Carolina household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for Rhode Island
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Rhode Island. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2012 IECC base code is cost-effective for residential buildings in all climate zones in Rhode Island.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2018 IECC for Rhode Island
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2018 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Rhode Island. Moving to the 2018 IECC from the current base code of 2012 IECC is cost-effective for single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in all climate zones in Rhode Island.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in Rhode Island
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 18.5% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 791 of annual utility bill savings for the average Rhode Island household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for Pennsylvania
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Pennsylvania. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2009 IECC base code is costeffective for residential buildings in all climate zones in Pennsylvania.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2018 IECC for Pennsylvania
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2018 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Pennsylvania. Moving to the 2018 IECC from the current base code of 2015 IECC with amendments is cost-effective for single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in all climate zones in Pennsylvania.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in Pennsylvania
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
Moving to the 2021 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) is cost-effective for both single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in Pennsylvania. The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 13.5% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 331 of annual utility bill savings for the average Pennsylvania household. It will reduce statewide CO2 emissions over 30 years by 11,860,000 metric tons, equivalent to the annual CO2 emissions of 2,579,000 cars on the road (1 MMT CO2 = 217,480 cars driven/year).
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in Oregon
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 5.1% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 79 of annual utility bill savings for the average Oregon household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for Oklahoma
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Oklahoma. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2009 IECC base code is costeffective for residential buildings in all climate zones in Oklahoma.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2018 IECC for Oklahoma
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2018 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Oklahoma. Moving to the 2018 IECC from the current base code of 2009 IECC with amendments is cost-effective for single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in all climate zones in Oklahoma.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in Oklahoma
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 29.1% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 765 of annual utility bill savings for the average Oklahoma household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for Ohio
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Ohio. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2009 IECC base code is cost-effective for residential buildings in all climate zones in Ohio
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in Ohio
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 12% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 253 of annual utility bill savings for the average Ohio household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for North Dakota
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in North Dakota. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2009 IECC base code is cost-effective for residential buildings in all climate zones in North Dakota.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2018 IECC for North Dakota
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2018 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in North Dakota. Moving to the 2018 IECC from the current base code of 2009 IECC is cost-effective for single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in all climate zones in North Dakota.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in North Dakota
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 26.5% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 707 of annual utility bill savings for the average North Dakota household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for North Carolina
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in North Carolina. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2012 North Carolina State Code base code is cost-effective for residential buildings in all climate zones in North Carolina.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2018 IECC for North Carolina
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2018 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in North Carolina. Moving to the 2018 IECC from the current base code of 2015 IECC with amendments is cost-effective for single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in all climate zones in North Carolina.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in North Carolina
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 16.3% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 335 of annual utility bill savings for the average North Carolina household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for New York
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in New York. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2009 IECC base code is cost-effective for residential buildings in all climate zones in New York.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2018 IECC for New York
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2018 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in New York. Moving to the 2018 IECC from the current base code of 2015 IECC is cost-effective for single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in all climate zones in New York.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in New York
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 8.4% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 205 of annual utility bill savings for the average New York household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for New Mexico
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in New Mexico. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2009 IECC base code is cost-effective for residential buildings in all climate zones in New Mexico.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2018 IECC for New Mexico
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2018 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in New Mexico. Moving to the 2018 IECC from the current base code of 2009 IECC is cost-effective for single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in all climate zones in New Mexico.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in New Mexico
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 12% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 258 of annual utility bill savings for the average New Mexico household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for New Jersey
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in New Jersey. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2015 New Jersey State Code base code is cost-effective for residential buildings in all climate zones in New Jersey.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2018 IECC for New Jersey
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2018 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in New Jersey. Moving to the 2018 IECC from the current base code of 2015 IECC with amendments is cost-effective for single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in all climate zones in New Jersey.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in New Jersey
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 16.1% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 385 of annual utility bill savings for the average New Jersey household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for New Hampshire
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in New Hampshire. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2010 New Hampshire State Code base code is cost-effective for residential buildings in all climate zones in New Hampshire.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2018 IECC for New Hampshire
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2018 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in New Hampshire. Moving to the 2018 IECC from the current base code of 2009 IECC with amendments is cost-effective for single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in all climate zones in New Hampshire.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in New Hampshire
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 15.1% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 521 of annual utility bill savings for the average New Hampshire household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for Nevada
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Nevada. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2012 IECC base code is cost-effective for residential buildings in all climate zones in Nevada.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in Nevada
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 9.7% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 175 of annual utility bill savings for the average Nevada household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for Nebraska
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Nebraska. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2009 IECC base code is costeffective for residential buildings in all climate zones in Nebraska.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2018 IECC for Nebraska
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2018 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Nebraska. Moving to the 2018 IECC from the current base code of 2009 IECC is cost-effective for single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in all climate zones in Nebraska.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in Nebraska
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 7.9% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 159 of annual utility bill savings for the average Nebraska household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for Montana
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Montana. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2014 Montana State Code base code is cost-effective for residential buildings in all climate zones in Montana.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2018 IECC for Montana
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2018 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Montana. Moving to the 2018 IECC from the current base code of 2012 IECC with amendments is cost-effective for single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in all climate zones in Montana.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in Montana
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 9% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 171 of annual utility bill savings for the average Montana household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for Missouri
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Missouri. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2009 IECC base code is costeffective for residential buildings in all climate zones in Missouri.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2018 IECC for Missouri
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2018 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Missouri. Moving to the 2018 IECC from the current base code of 2009 IECC is cost-effective for single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in all climate zones in Missouri.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in Missouri
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 26% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 657 of annual utility bill savings for the average Missouri household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for Mississippi
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Mississippi. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2009 IECC base code is costeffective for residential buildings in all climate zones in Mississippi.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2018 IECC for Mississippi
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2018 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Mississippi. Moving to the 2018 IECC from the current base code of 2009 IECC is cost-effective for single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in all climate zones in Mississippi.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in Mississippi
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 25% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 613 of annual utility bill savings for the average Mississippi household. It will reduce statewide CO2 emissions over 30 years by 8,070,000 metric tons, equivalent to the annual CO2 emissions of 1,755,000 cars on the road (1 MMT CO2 = 217,480 cars driven/year).
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for Minnesota
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Minnesota. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2012 IECC base code is costeffective for residential buildings in all climate zones in Minnesota.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2018 IECC for Minnesota
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2018 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Minnesota. Moving to the 2018 IECC from the current base code of 2012 IECC with amendments is cost-effective for single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in all climate zones in Minnesota.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in Minnesota
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 9.1% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 231 of annual utility bill savings for the average Minnesota household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for Michigan
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Michigan. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2009 IECC base code is costeffective for residential buildings in all climate zones in Michigan.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2018 IECC for Michigan
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2018 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Michigan. Moving to the 2018 IECC from the current base code of 2012 IECC with amendments is cost-effective for single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in all climate zones in Michigan.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in Michigan
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 10.7% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 327 of annual utility bill savings for the average Michigan household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the 2021 IECC for the State of Michigan
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The resulting analysis shows that a home designed to comply with the residential provisions of the 2021 IECC would yield short-term and long-term consumer benefits compared to a home built to the Michigan-amended 2015 IECC. When building to the 2021 IECC, Michigan households can expect to save 10.7% in energy costs, equating to $396 of annual utility bill savings.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for Massachusetts
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Massachusetts. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2012 IECC base code is costeffective for residential buildings in all climate zones in Massachusetts.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2018 IECC for Massachusetts
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2018 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Massachusetts. Moving to the 2018 IECC from the current base code of 2015 IECC with amendments is cost-effective for single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in all climate zones in Massachusetts.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in Massachusetts
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 2.4% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 71 of annual utility bill savings for the average Massachusetts household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for Maryland
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Maryland. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2012 IECC base code is costeffective for residential buildings in all climate zones in Maryland.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in Maryland
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 10.6% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 257 of annual utility bill savings for the average Maryland household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for Maine
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Maine. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2009 IECC base code is cost-effective for residential buildings in all climate zones in Maine.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2018 IECC for Maine
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2018 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Maine. Moving to the 2018 IECC from the current base code of 2009 IECC is cost-effective for single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in all climate zones in Maine.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in Maine
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 23.5% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 978 of annual utility bill savings for the average Maine household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for Louisiana
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Louisiana. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2009 IECC base code is costeffective for residential buildings in all climate zones in Louisiana.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2018 IECC for Louisiana
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2018 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Louisiana. Moving to the 2018 IECC from the current base code of 2009 IECC is cost-effective for single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in all climate zones in Louisiana.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in Louisiana
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 20% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 411 of annual utility bill savings for the average Louisiana household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for Kentucky
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Kentucky. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2009 IECC base code is costeffective for residential buildings in all climate zones in Kentucky.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2018 IECC for Kentucky
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2018 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Kentucky. Moving to the 2018 IECC from the current base code of 2009 IECC is cost-effective for single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in all climate zones in Kentucky.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in Kentucky
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 28.5% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 687 of annual utility bill savings for the average Kentucky household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for Kansas
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Kansas. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2009 IECC base code is cost-effective for residential buildings in all climate zones in Kansas.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2018 IECC for Kansas
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2018 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Kansas. Moving to the 2018 IECC from the current base code of 2009 IECC is cost-effective for single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in all climate zones in Kansas.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in Kansas
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 25.9% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 691 of annual utility bill savings for the average Kansas household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for Iowa
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Iowa. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2014 Iowa State Code base code is costeffective for residential buildings in all climate zones in Iowa.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2018 IECC for Iowa
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2018 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Iowa. Moving to the 2018 IECC from the current base code of 2012 IECC with amendments is cost-effective for single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in all climate zones in Iowa.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in Iowa
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 12.7% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 336 of annual utility bill savings for the average Iowa household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for Indiana
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Indiana. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2009 IECC base code is cost-effective for residential buildings in all climate zones in Indiana.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2018 IECC for Indiana
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2018 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Indiana. Moving to the 2018 IECC from the current base code of 2009 IECC is cost-effective for single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in all climate zones in Indiana.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in Indiana
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 13.9% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 324 of annual utility bill savings for the average Indiana household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for Illinois
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Illinois. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2012 IECC base code is cost-effective for residential buildings in all climate zones in Illinois.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in Illinois
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 9.8% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 188 of annual utility bill savings for the average Illinois household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for Idaho
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Idaho. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2015 Idaho State Code base code is costeffective for residential buildings in all climate zones in Idaho.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2018 IECC for Idaho
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2018 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Idaho. Moving to the 2018 IECC from the current base code of 2012 IECC with amendments is cost-effective for single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in all climate zones in Idaho.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in Idaho
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 15.2% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 281 of annual utility bill savings for the average Idaho household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for Hawaii
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Hawaii. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2006 IECC base code is cost-effective for residential buildings in all climate zones in Hawaii.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in Hawaii
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 16.8% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 870 of annual utility bill savings for the average Hawaii household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for Georgia
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Georgia. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2011 Georgia State Code base code is cost-effective for residential buildings in all climate zones in Georgia.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2018 IECC for Georgia
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2018 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Georgia. Moving to the 2018 IECC from the current base code of 2009 IECC with amendments is cost-effective for single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in all climate zones in Georgia.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in Georgia
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 15.1% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 317 of annual utility bill savings for the average Georgia household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for Florida
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Florida. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2012 IECC base code is cost-effective for residential buildings in all climate zones in Florida.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2018 IECC for Florida
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2018 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Florida. Moving to the 2018 IECC from the current base code of 2015 IECC with amendments is cost-effective for single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in all climate zones in Florida.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in Florida
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 11.7% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 219 of annual utility bill savings for the average Florida household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for the District of Columbia
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in the District of Columbia. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2013 Washington DC Code base code is cost-effective for residential buildings in all climate zones in the District of Columbia.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2018 IECC for the District of Columbia
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2018 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in the District of Columbia. Moving to the 2018 IECC from the current base code of 2012 IECC with amendments is cost-effective for single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in all climate zones in the District of Columbia.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in District of Columbia
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 11% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 158 of annual utility bill savings for the average District of Columbia household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for Delaware
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Delaware. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2012 IECC base code is costeffective for residential buildings in all climate zones in Delaware.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2018 IECC for Delaware
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2018 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Delaware. Moving to the 2018 IECC from the current base code of 2012 IECC is cost-effective for single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in all climate zones in Delaware.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in Delaware
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 9.8% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 276 of annual utility bill savings for the average Delaware household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for Connecticut
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Connecticut. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2009 IECC base code is costeffective for residential buildings in all climate zones in Connecticut.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2018 IECC for Connecticut
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2018 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Connecticut. Moving to the 2018 IECC from the current base code of 2015 IECC with amendments is cost-effective for single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in all climate zones in Connecticut.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in Connecticut
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
Moving to the 2021 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) is cost-effective for both single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in Connecticut. The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 8.8% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 292 of annual utility bill savings for the average Connecticut household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for Colorado
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Colorado. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2009 IECC base code is costeffective for residential buildings in all climate zones in Colorado.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2018 IECC for Residential Buildings in Colorado — 2015 IECC Baseline
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
Moving to the 2018 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) is cost-effective for both single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in Colorado. The 2018 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 1.0% across all climate zones compared to the 2015 IECC. This equates to $17 of annual utility bill savings for the average Colorado household.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in Colorado — 2015 IECC Baseline
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
Moving to the 2021 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) is cost-effective for both single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in Colorado. The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 8.6% across all climate zones compared to the 2015 IECC. This equates to $156 of annual utility bill savings for the average Colorado household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for Arkansas
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Arkansas. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2009 IECC base code is costeffective for residential buildings in all climate zones in Arkansas.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2018 IECC for Arkansas
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2018 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Arkansas. Moving to the 2018 IECC from the current base code of 2009 IECC with amendments is cost-effective for single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in all climate zones in Arkansas.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in Arkansas
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
Moving to the 2021 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) is cost-effective for both single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in Arkansas. The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 30.2% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 760 of annual utility bill savings for the average Arkansas household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for Arizona
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Arizona. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2009 IECC base code is costeffective for residential buildings in all climate zones in Arizona.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2018 IECC for Arizona
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2018 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Arizona. Moving to the 2018 IECC from the current base code of 2009 IECC is cost-effective for single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in all climate zones in Arizona.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in Arizona
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
Moving to the 2021 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) is cost-effective for both single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in Arizona. The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 18.1% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 433 of annual utility bill savings for the average Arizona household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for Alaska
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Alaska. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2009 IECC base code is cost-effective for residential buildings in all climate zones in Alaska.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2018 IECC for Alaska
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2018 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Alaska. Moving to the 2018 IECC from the current base code of 2009 IECC is cost-effective for single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in all climate zones in Alaska.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in Alaska
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 29.2% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 1884 of annual utility bill savings for the average Alaska household.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2015 IECC for Alabama
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2015 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Alabama. Moving to the 2015 IECC from the 2009 IECC base code is costeffective for residential buildings in all climate zones in Alabama.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Residential Provisions of the 2018 IECC for Alabama
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2018 IECC provides cost-effective savings for residential buildings in Alabama. Moving to the 2018 IECC from the current base code of 2015 IECC with amendments is cost-effective for single-family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings in all climate zones in Alabama.
Cost-Effectiveness of the 2021 IECC for Residential Buildings in Alabama
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The 2021 IECC will provide statewide energy savings of 13% across all climate zones compared to the current state energy code. This equates to $ 304 of annual utility bill savings for the average Alabama household.
National Cost-Effectiveness of the Residential Provisions of the 2018 IECC
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
Construction based on the 2018 IECC is cost-effective when compared to construction based on the 2015 IECC across all climate zones. Simple payback ranges from immediate to 2.8 years for construction based on the 2018 IECC when compared to construction based on the 2015 IECC. In all cases, homeowners see net positive cash flows in the first year.
National Cost Effectiveness of the Residential Provisions of the 2021 IECC
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The prescriptive and mandatory provisions of the 2021 IECC are shown to generate an average life-cycle cost savings of $2,320, an average payback of 10.5 years, and the years to cumulative positive cashflow averaging 4 years for all climate zones.
National CostEffectiveness of the Residential Provisions of the 2024 IECC
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
The prescriptive and mandatory provisions of the 2024 IECC are shown to generate an average life-cycle cost savings of $2,954, an average payback of 2.5 years, and the years to cumulative positive cashflow averaging 1 year.
Energy and Energy Cost Savings Analysis of the 2018 IECC for Commercial Buildings
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
Overall, the 2018 edition of the IECC results in site energy savings of 5.1% at the aggregate national level compared to the 2015 IECC edition.
Energy and Energy Cost Savings Analysis of the 2021 IECC for Commercial Buildings
U.S. Department of Energy (PNNL)
Overall, the 2021 edition of the IECC results in site energy savings of 12.1% at the aggregate national level compared to the 2018 IECC edition. In addition, on a national weighted average basis, the 2021 IECC is 6.5% more efficient for site energy use than Standard 90.1-2019.
Real Estate Market Response to Enhanced Building Codes in Moore, OK
Simmons, Kevin M. and Kovacs, Paul
Moore, OK, suffered 3 violent tornadoes from 1999-2013, the most recent causing $3 billion in damage and 24 fatalities. In response the city enhanced their building code. Research shows the updated code had no effect on either home sales or price per square foot for new homes in Moore.
Tornado shelters and the housing market
Simmons, K. M., & Sutter, D. , Construction Management and Economics
Investigated the existence of a premium for tornado shelters using home sales in Oklahoma City, where the deadly tornado outbreak of 3 May 1999 and the Oklahoma Saferoom Initiative increased public awareness of tornado shelters. Found that a shelter increases the sale price of a home by 3.5% to 4% or approximately $4200 given the mean price of homes sold in 2005.
Valuing Mitigation: Real Estate Market Response to Hurricane Loss Reduction Measures
Kevin M. Simmons, Jamie Brown Kruse and Douglas A. Smith, Southern Economic Journal
Buyers paid an almost 6 percent premium for homes with hurricane shutters on Galveston Island, TX
Economic Effectiveness of Implementing a Statewide Building Code: The Case of Florida
Kevin M. Simmons, Jeffrey Czajkowski and James M. Done, Land Economics
Using 10 years of paid insured loss, data show that the Florida Building Code (FBC) reduced windstorm losses by up to 72%, The FBC passes the BCA by a margin of $6 in full reduced loss to $1 of added cost, with a payback period of approximately 8 years.
Natural Hazard Mitigation Saves
National Institute of Building Sciences
This study found that society enjoys a benefit-cost ratio (BCR) of 11:1 for adopting the 2018 International Residential Code (IRC) and International Building Code (IBC), the model building codes developed by the International Code Council (also known as the I-Codes), versus codes represented by 1990-era design; and a BCR of 4:1 for investments to exceed select provisions of the 2015 IRC and IBC.
Building Codes Save (BCS) – Fire Hazards Pilot Study
Federal Emergency Management Agency
For structure fires, the results demonstrate considerable savings for building and contents, reaching nearly $1.8 billion over the 75-year useful life of residential structures in California and over $44.9 million in Boulder and El Paso counties, Colorado, due to modern codes. For wildfire, modern building codes savings of $24.4 billion are estimated in California and $457.7 million in Boulder and El Paso counties, Colorado, over the useful life of the properties.
Building Codes Save: A Nationwide Study
Federal Emergency Management Agency
The IRC and IBC provided more than $27 billion in cumulative mitigation benefits against flood, hurricane wind, and earthquake hazards from 2000 to 2016. If all new buildings across the U.S. were built to modern editions of the I-Codes, the country would save more than $600 billion by 2060.
No studies match the current filters.